Both options were dicey. People saw the collusion between the justice dept, the media, and the DNC and apparently decided those actions were a bigger threat than mean words.

That, and, Trump spoke to the issues of a suffering majority, instead of playing the minority against the majority as HRC and the left typically do. They can claim he ran on divisive, negative rhetoric, but that is the whole democratic platform, accusing anyone of racism for being concerned about criminal aliens and terrorists. Lecturing american christians on the crusades after ISIS arose. Parroting misleading feminist statistics. Michael Moore called Trump the biggest fuck you ever recorded in human history (https://youtu.be/YKeYbEOSqYc). David Gelernter, a professor from Yale, called him 'a message from the voters', 'the empty gin bottle they have chosen to toss through the window.' (http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-and-the-emasculated-voter-1476484865)

Why would they do that? They see a toxic culture corrupting and twisting americans' view of themselves and everything around them and they oppose it.

some relevant/interesting posts



http://imgur.com/gallery/5Je4dxb

http://imgur.com/gallery/SxpJC

http://imgur.com/gallery/HO5TT

http://imgur.com/gallery/l2LZh

The point if you don't want to read it: thinking people didn't vote like you because they are evil or stupid, is deluding yourself. People had valid concerns about HRC as much as they did about Trump; her domestic policies and the culture she represents, plus her hawkish record and carrying on Obama's legacy, which amounted to billions going into Iran, Saudi Arabia, and ISIS, and rising US-Russian tensions...

the world is bigger than the liberal media bubble.

k

finally. the suspense was almost too much to bear

Yes, all that is bad, and if he does it more to women than to men, it suggests sexist views and not just general rudeness.

However it is not evidence of rape and we should all be thankful that saying mean/nasty things to a woman doesn't put us in jail for rape or get us convicted of insulting all women. We should be thankful that a woman accusing a man isn't proof in itself.

Even if that's how the court of public opinion works, that is not how the justice system works, because that kind of thinking doesn't create justice.

I hope it isn't true and the accusations are false or exaggerated -- but if it were proven true then yes he'd be a criminal. The same logic applies to the accusations against Hillary. It'd be nice to have an alternate vote system where you rank the candidates, and then we'd probably have more options even at this late stage, but in any case it's not a democracy it's a republic.

I don't get it. maybe there's nothing to get

Most people don't know that he maintains a non profit foundation of his own, Trump Foundation, and he has been using it to pay his debts and fines.

I heard about that. if you have any non partisan articles on it, link plz

whoa RIAers are real people
what
go back to being fonts and pixels

it's partly because some people don't have time to play the game. so they will pay others to play it for them.

but whatever who cares. they demonstrated the viability of this 'new' genre. someone else will come along with a better implementation

sleep tight pupper

happy birthday gangs