Random Insanity Alliance Forum, Mark V
Cactuar Zone => Random lnsanity => Topic started by: Agent Lemon on October 26, 2011, 12:33:02 pm
-
00 = 1
At least in some contexts. In other contexts it's considered to be undefined.
-
(http://kennythefox.com/GIF/trains.gif)
-
00 = 1
At least in some contexts. In other contexts it's considered to be undefined.
The only way to prove a statement like this is to see if the reverse is also true. Does 1 = 00? Not really, with some exceptions.
-
The guy who told me it has a masters in math. He didn't explain how it worked though.
It says "math error" when I put it in my calculator, but if you google 0^0 it says it's equal to 1.
also trains
-
That is because x0 will always equal one. So it does not matter if x is zero or three, it will equal one.
-
Mia is right. Your calculator just sucks.
-
I know x0 is 1 in general, but 00 is a weird case. Try it on your calculator and see.
-
Moral of the story, math is dumb.
-
You shouldn't need a calculator for it and zero is not an odd case when it is true for all numbers, so why wouldn't it be true for zero?
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponent#Zero_to_the_zero_power (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponent#Zero_to_the_zero_power)
tl;dr: It's 1 most of the time, but not always.
-
For most it is and for general more lower level math, assuming that x to the zero power equals one is safer.
-
If it weren't an odd case I think my calculator would be able to work it out.
From what I've been reading it's not something that's set in stone.
http://community.wolframalpha.com/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=11131 (http://community.wolframalpha.com/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=11131)
0^0 itself is undefined. The lack of a well-defined meaning for this quantity follows from the mutually contradictory facts that a^0 is always 1, so 0^0 should equal 1, but 0^a is always 0 (for a>0), so 0^0 should equal 0. It could be argued that 0^0=1 is a natural definition since
lim_(n->0)n^n=lim_(n->0^+)n^n=lim_(n->0^-)n^n=1.
However, the limit does not exist for general complex values of n. Therefore, the choice of definition for 0^0 is usually defined to be indeterminate.
It says it's highly debated among mathematicians.
But yeah, it's basically safe to say it's 1 most of the time.
-
Anything to the 0 power is 1 even I know that :jig:
-
It is the mathematical equivalent of a singularity, and we are all being sucked in.
-
It is the mathematical equivalent of a singularity, and we are all being sucked in.
Singularities are always mathematical.
-
Singularity this! Bitch!
(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/165638_164514083592643_100001021584634_352206_8191865_n.jpg)
-
:fapfaptrain:
-
Singularity this! Bitch!
(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/165638_164514083592643_100001021584634_352206_8191865_n.jpg)
Holy shit, is that ET?
-
gangs you shouldn't post your mom's pics on the RIA. even if she asked you to.
-
It is the mathematical equivalent of a singularity, and we are all being sucked in.
Singularities are always mathematical.
Except when they are manifest.
-
gangs you shouldn't post your mom's pics on the RIA. even if she asked you to.
You're just jealous you'll never be as cool as her! You'll die knowing that...
-
She really let herself go since I dumped her. Damn.
-
She really let herself go since I dumped her. Damn.
Where's my basketball hoop dad? Where's MY basketball hoop?
-
You ever hear of a good Indian basketball player, gangs? Exactly, there are none, so stick to a sport your people are good at, like competitive not-eating.
-
You ever hear of a good Indian basketball player, gangs? Exactly, there are none, so stick to a sport your people are good at, like competitive not-eating.
I'll have you know that i went to the national hunger strike marathon and came second in the 2 and a half years round.
But that's besides the point... I'm having a reunion rebellion right now.
-
She really let herself go since I dumped her. Damn.
Where's my basketball hoop dad? Where's MY basketball hoop?
We can use you mother's vagina as usual.
-
You never loved me.
-
Gangs, my love for you is profound. I love all fellow trolls.
-
-1=i
So, technically, we are the R-1A
Or, more simplified, -RA
-
No, i=sqrt(-1).
-
And 'a' represents 1, so I guess we are at:
RIA = sqrt(-1) * radius * 1
RIA = sqrt(-r)
-
Actually, if we want a to equal 1, then:
RIA=sqrt(-1)*radius*1
RIA^2=-1*radius^2*1
RIA^2=-1*radius*radius
RIA^2=-R&R
RIA=Ri
-
Actually, if we want a to equal 1, then:
RIA=sqrt(-1)*radius*1
RIA^2=-1*radius^2*1
RIA^2=-1*radius*radius
RIA^2=-R&R
RIA=Ri
Leo, you are amazing.
-
so we are back to RIA=R*sqrt(-1)
-
Actually, if we want a to equal 1, then:
RIA=sqrt(-1)*radius*1
RIA^2=-1*radius^2*1
RIA^2=-1*radius*radius
RIA^2=-R&R
RIA=Ri
Leo, you are amazing.
Show me your love with some llamas.
Alternate Comment: Not the first time you've told me that while laying on your back, Arse.
-
Let's go with the alternate.