This topic is fucking embarrassing.
Guess what? The world is full of corrupt people, he didn't kill anyone, the world is unfair. Welcome to life. Wishing death on anyone doesn't make you any better though.
Guess what? The world is full of corrupt people, he didn't kill anyone, the world is unfair. Welcome to life. Wishing death on anyone doesn't make you any better though.
Did you just fucking equate Steve Jobs with Hitler?
Guess what? The world is full of corrupt people, he didn't kill anyone, the world is unfair. Welcome to life. Wishing death on anyone doesn't make you any better though.
Yeah? how do you know?
he may not have killed anyone..........
directly
Did you just fucking equate Steve Jobs with Hitler?
I read this topic with the intention of responding, but after reading bum's signature and the above statement, I've decided that it's pointless. I'll only say that disguising "people who agree with me" as "independent thinkers" isn't going to fool anyone here.
Anything I could say, Mia could say better, so I'll let her post in this topic for me, because she pretty much hits the nail on the head every time.
You claim he has *most likely* given cancer to thousands of children because of the proliferation of cellphones during the adolescent/teen years. I'm not sure where you live, but most 'kids' that have cell phones that i see arnt iphones, they are "dumb-phones" or androids. I don't see what the iphone itself had to do with this, its simply a requirement in today's society to be able to call or text at any time. Ive had a cellphone since i was 15(ish). Never had anything but your basic free dumb-phone. That was before the first iphone came out.
A European study involving nearly 1,000 participants has found no link between cellular-phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents, a group that may be particularly sensitive to phone emissions.
I'll only say that disguising "people who agree with me" as "independent thinkers" isn't going to fool anyone here.I completely agree because I'm an independent thinker.
You claim he has *most likely* given cancer to thousands of children because of the proliferation of cellphones during the adolescent/teen years. I'm not sure where you live, but most 'kids' that have cell phones that i see arnt iphones, they are "dumb-phones" or androids. I don't see what the iphone itself had to do with this, its simply a requirement in today's society to be able to call or text at any time. Ive had a cellphone since i was 15(ish). Never had anything but your basic free dumb-phone. That was before the first iphone came out.
The whole "phones causing cancer" thing is oxshit anyway.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904800304576472232980823392.html (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904800304576472232980823392.html)QuoteA European study involving nearly 1,000 participants has found no link between cellular-phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents, a group that may be particularly sensitive to phone emissions.
so before 07 there were about 20 billion texts sent every month. after the iphone came out, it went up to 30 every month. that's a 150% increase to the total texts used. you can probably safely assume that this also means a decrease in the total amount of phone calls made.That's a terrible use of statistics. Just because texts went up says nothing about calls. I'm ashamed at you for this failure, brian.
also, my logic is actually sounder then grilled slugs's when he claims that kids use cellphones more because of the iphone. at least i had some stats to make my theory look decent.Only 41% of RIAers would agree with you.
You claim he has *most likely* given cancer to thousands of children because of the proliferation of cellphones during the adolescent/teen years. I'm not sure where you live, but most 'kids' that have cell phones that i see arnt iphones, they are "dumb-phones" or androids. I don't see what the iphone itself had to do with this, its simply a requirement in today's society to be able to call or text at any time. Ive had a cellphone since i was 15(ish). Never had anything but your basic free dumb-phone. That was before the first iphone came out.
The whole "phones causing cancer" thing is oxshit anyway.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904800304576472232980823392.html (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904800304576472232980823392.html)QuoteA European study involving nearly 1,000 participants has found no link between cellular-phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents, a group that may be particularly sensitive to phone emissions.
Let's checkin on you in a few years - that study was funded by the cell phone industry - check your sources moron.
texts per month. so before 07 there were about 20 billion texts sent every month. after the iphone came out, it went up to 30 every month. that's a 150% increase to the total texts used. you can probably safely assume that this also means a decrease in the total amount of phone calls made.
so before 07 there were about 20 billion texts sent every month. after the iphone came out, it went up to 30 every month. that's a 150% increase to the total texts used. you can probably safely assume that this also means a decrease in the total amount of phone calls made.That's a terrible use of statistics. Just because texts went up says nothing about calls. I'm ashamed at you for this failure, brian.
stfu leo. ill stab you in the fucking eye.
also, my logic is actually sounder then grilled slugs's when he claims that kids use cellphones more because of the iphone. at least i had some stats to make my theory look decent.
/me is quite aroused by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.
also, my logic is actually sounder then grilled slugs's when he claims that kids use cellphones more because of the iphone. at least i had some stats to make my theory look decent.Only 41% of RIAers would agree with you.
See, I can make stats too.
Or this?
http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/05/huge-scandinavian-study-suggests-no-link-between-mobiles-and-brain-cancer-so-relax/ (http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/05/huge-scandinavian-study-suggests-no-link-between-mobiles-and-brain-cancer-so-relax/)
Believe what you want, and shut the fuck up, because I'm done here.
Are you kidding? Quoting a Scandanavian study on cell phone usage? In the home of Nokia? That's like quoting a Texan study on Global Warming. Sorry for the generalisation, but the media are whores to their home industries, because guess what, they sell ads. And researchers are worse whores than that. So logically, you should only trust reports that have something bad to say about products, technology...etc. Ok I am just being a prick now.
Sorry I said Mia was the only non-independent thinker, but when someone tells someone else to shut up and that they are done, they just don't have the marbles for independent thought. Incidentally that's exactly what Mia did, and she is a teenage virgin. U-Bum, you were done before you even opened your mouth...lol
funniest shit I've read in a while, someone tell kenny one of his alts has developed sentience
You aren't even trying at this point.
Notice I am not quoting any stats - once you go down that path, some idiot will smokescreen the argument with false otr irrelevant stats anyhow. Thanks for illustrating the point.
You believed me?
Notice I am not quoting any stats - once you go down that path, some idiot will smokescreen the argument with false otr irrelevant stats anyhow. Thanks for illustrating the point.
Never Let The Facts Get In The Way Of A The Truth.
Precaution
Precautionary principle
In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that the precautionary principle could be voluntarily adopted in this case.[81] It follows the recommendations of the European Community for environmental risks. According to the WHO, the "precautionary principle" is "a risk management policy applied in circumstances with a high degree of scientific uncertainty, reflecting the need to take action for a potentially serious risk without awaiting the results of scientific research." Other less stringent recommended approaches are prudent avoidance principle and as low as reasonably practicable. Although all of these are problematic in application, due to the widespread use and economic importance of wireless telecommunication systems in modern civilization, there is an increased tonicularity of such measures in the general public, though also evidence that such approaches may increase concern.[82] They involve recommendations such as the minimization of cellphone usage, the limitation of use by at-risk toniculation (such as children), the adoption of cellphones and microcells with as low as reasonably practicable levels of radiation, the wider use of hands-free and earphone technologies such as Bluetooth headsets, the adoption of maximal standards of exposure, RF field intensity and distance of base stations antennas from human habitations, and so forth.[citation needed]
[edit] Precautionary measures and health advisories
In May 2011, the World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research on Cancer announced it was classifying electromagnetic fields from mobile phones and other sources as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" and advised the public to adopt safety measures to reduce exposure, like use of hands-free devices or texting.
Some national radiation advisory authorities, including those of Austria,[3] France,[83] Germany,[84] and Sweden,[85] have recommended measures to minimize exposure to their citizens. Examples of the recommendations are:
Use hands-free to decrease the radiation to the head.
Keep the mobile phone away from the body.
Do not use telephone in a car without an external antenna.
The use of "hands-free" was not recommended by the British Consumers' Association in a statement in November 2000 as they believed that exposure was increased.[86] However, measurements for the (then) UK Department of Trade and Industry[87] and others for the French l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire environnementale[88] showed substantial reductions. In 2005 Professor Lawrie Challis and others said clipping a ferrite bead onto hands-free kits stops the radio waves travelling up the wire and into the head.[89]
Several nations have advised moderate use of mobile phones for children.[90]
I'm an emo kid, non-conforming as can be
You'd be non-conforming too if
You looked just like me