Random Insanity Alliance Forum, Mark V
Cactuar Zone => Random lnsanity => Topic started by: Pterrydactyl on January 20, 2012, 07:28:47 pm
-
http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/20/technology/SOPA_PIPA_postponed/ (http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/20/technology/SOPA_PIPA_postponed/)
Queen - We are the champions, live (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdCrZfTkG1c#)
-
greatsuccess.jpg
But the issue will just come back in a different form down the road.
-
Pipa Middleton is dead!?!?!? What shall England's monarchy do without her?
-
That youtube link is Illegal copyright infringement, under law we are required to report all infringers, this includes link providers. You have 24hrs to turn yourself into the proper authorities, for a mandatory 5 year prison sentence, per each unauthorised viewing, and pay a fine of no greater then $250,000 in damages per violation.
Failure to comply with these rules,will result in being determined to be an enemy combatant, Under S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act. and will result in Indefinite Detention.
(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT4zKs_YqVYnm69m5cvVVdF-ulRwMoZVi8dOy1GsOOokMtk0_OLim0kcNA)(http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlt7p0p3aCGWVnzLtFzaxa_xtHBCbb5-P9Y7G5dymbjW62m2O1KJtOfX4)(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjyn-tBQvPXL5Ft3x73jKZwMUcU3KMUoGPhUZLBJQj6kiFiol1ZXH_xw)(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR7SqpkrLF-rKcxCtDLLt3miO5mqHM3EUUA91OTCe0WX7s1-pJ9qEmMqZg)
-
Meh they will just stick parts of it in some defense or national security bills down the line.
-
Safe... for now.
Perhaps now they'll consult people who actually know how the Internet works to find a way of passing the same material without everyone noticing.
-
I'm curious, do you have a cat?
-
did he have a cat i think is a better question. then again, perhaps he doesnt know yet...
-
I knew the moment I posted outside of the embassy I'd get bombarded with catty comments.
I do not own a cat. They have all disappeared because their parents thought they were too similar to them, so they pushed the gov to "dispose" of them.
I almost made that on topic. This post sucks. Please disregard.
-
Well until we. Have an answer one way or the other, he both does and does not have a cat.
-
That is only true if the odds are fifty-fifty, which they are not. 2/3 people (or households) own a cat (or cats). In the thought problem proposed by Schroedinger, 50-50 was enforced by a Geiger counter (detects radiation) and a radioactive material that after some time would have exactly a 50 percent chance of releasing radiation. But if you don't enforce the 50 percent-ness, your statement is not viable.
-
Technically, while 66% of people might have a cat, there are still only 2 possibilities:
a. Have a Cat or
b. Not have a cat
Until we know which it is, it's both.
-
http://live.drjays.com/index.php/2012/01/20/sopa-is-defeated-but-new-internet-bill-gains-critics/ (http://live.drjays.com/index.php/2012/01/20/sopa-is-defeated-but-new-internet-bill-gains-critics/)
xfd this country sucks shit
-
http://torrentfreak.com/cyberlocker-ecosystem-shocked-as-big-players-take-drastic-action-120123/ (http://torrentfreak.com/cyberlocker-ecosystem-shocked-as-big-players-take-drastic-action-120123/)
-
It doesn't work that way. It's only both when both are equally likely.